Who is Negligent in a Personal Injury Case?

Legally, negligence is defined as the failure to take sensible caution in circumstances where a person would usually expect someone else’s property to strike other properties or individuals. 

It is also beneficial to consider what is not regarded as negligent conduct. The tort of negligence is a limited notion within the extensive idea of liability. Parties are frequently found accountable for many things that are barely negligent. 

What is Duty of Care and How Does it Fit into Personal Injury Cases?

Duty of care is a legal word that implies the accountability an individual must prevent bringing about harm to someone else. In a personal injury case, the first step in showing that another individual was negligent is to determine that the person had a duty of care in the circumstances that caused the injury. The plaintiff, or injured individual, must demonstrate precisely how the defendant, or the other party, failed to satisfy that duty – in other words, how the behavior of the defendant violated the duty of care. When this breach is proven, the last step in substantiating negligence is to demonstrate that the plaintiff endured actual injuries that were brought about by that breach.

For a plaintiff in a personal injury case, showing a breach of care requires exhibiting that actions taken or untaken by the defendant failed to satisfy the necessary degree of sensible caution under the circumstances. However, what precisely is the suitable standard of care in a certain situation, or in different kinds of personal injury cases? It relies on the facts of every separate case.

For example, the driver of a vehicle always has a legal obligation to maneuver his or her vehicle with sensible caution, which consists of considering factors, such as traffic conditions, weather, and visibility. State legislatures have sanctioned vehicle and traffic codes which recognize drivers’ legal duties in a few circumstances and forbid specific driving-related behavior in other situations like speeding. Therefore, in many cases, if Driver "A" breaks a driving law, he or she will have violated the duty of care to other drivers, passengers, and pedestrians, if Driver A’s behavior brought about an accident in which others were injured.

The following are examples of the duty of care in other specific injury-related cases:

·     Slip and Fall: A property or business owner has a legal duty to maintain the premises by removing known dangers and must proceed within a sensible time to find and deal with other hazards as they show themselves.

·     Medical Malpractice: A physician or other medical specialist must give treatment with the same degree of skill and care that a sensibly proficient health care provider would behave under identical conditions. It is here that a person looks to the existing medical criteria and practices in the similar occupation or medical discipline, which is frequently corroborated by medical expert witnesses.

·     Defective Product: A consumer product’s manufacturer, distributor, and seller all have a legal obligation to make and sell products that do not have excessive or surprising 

hazards to the consumers.

Proving Fault

When the duty of care is proven, the plaintiff’s obligation, normally through his or her lawyer, is to prove precisely how the defendant broke that standard of care. Referring to the car accident example above, fault can be proven by:

·     Presenting that the defendant broke a traffic law

·     Eyewitness testimony of the accident

·     The plaintiff’s own testimony as to what occurred, and

·     The examination of evidence at the scene of the accident, including damage to the vehicle.

CONTACT:

DLE Lawyers

2151 S Le Jeune Rd

Miami FL, 33134

Phone: (305) 363-7855

Email: jimmy@jdlelaw.com